"For the past three years, everything Nader accomplished during his period of unparalleled creativity, which lasted from around 1963 to around 1976, has been systematically undermined by the Administration that he was instrumental in putting in power."
- Hendrik Hertzberg
Ralph Nader said a lot of things that needed to be heard during the 2000 campaign. But he also said there was really no difference between Bush and Gore. Despite the shortcomings of the two major parties, there is a real difference (can you say "John Ashcroft"?).
The 2004 election may be as close as the last one. It's time to make a choice. Even if you prefer Nader's positions to Kerry's, what will be the result of your voting for Nader? Will it really help achieve your goals? What will the country and the world look like after another four years of Bush?
We believe that we will be far better off with Kerry as President than with Bush, and that the issues Ralph Nader believes in and has fought for his whole career would be better served by his support for Kerry than by the quixotic campaign he is waging.
No comments:
Post a Comment